There are a group of seven tangent numbers( positive and negative) that describe the make up of the solar system, and possibly further. These tangents are based on three groups of degree numbers: 20, 40, 80, 160, 320 and 36, 72, 90, 108, 144, 180, 216, 256, 270, 288, 324, 360, and 60, 120, 240, 300. The tangents are (positive and negative)
0
.7265
3.0776
1.732
.363
.839
5.67
This is based on work by Carl Munck and others. I have expanded on the original tangents discovered of 3.0776 and .7265. There is a possible 8th tangent of .509, with degree numbers of 27, 207, 153, 333
These tangents and numbers describe orbital velocities, diameters of planets, surface areas, orbits in miles, distances between bodies, circumferences of bodies, and more. These numbers are based on ideal numbers for diameters etc. I suggest these numbers were of the original design of the solar system, and maybe the entire universe.
A few examples:
Earth diameter 7920 miles
7920 tangent 0
Sun orbital speed 450,000 mph
450,000 tangent 0
Earth circumference 24,900 miles
24,900 tangent 1.732
Earth to moon 238,900 miles
238,900 tangent .839
Earth surface area 196,900,000 sq miles
196,000,000 tangent -.363
Sirius A diameter 1,480,000 miles tangent .839
Proxima Centauri diameter 133, 320 miles tangent -1.73
Alpha Centauri diameter 1,057,700 miles tangent .363
Milky Way diameter 105,700 LY tangent .839
Observable universe diameter 465,000,000,000 tangent 1.73
Planetary tangents based on diameters:
Sun 0
Mercury .363
Venus .839
Earth 0
Moon 0
Mars 3.077
Jupiter 1.732
Saturn .839
Uranus .363
Neptune 0
Debra AI Prediction
Arguments
The unexamined thought is not worth thinking.
  Considerate: 86%  
  Substantial: 26%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 100%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 10.88  
  Sources: 0  
  Entity Sentiment Detection: existence of intelligent design    math      
  Relevant (Beta): 92%  
  Learn More About Debra
It's not math, it is numbers.
  Considerate: 79%  
  Substantial: 17%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 88%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 2.08  
  Sources: 0  
  Entity Sentiment Detection: math    numbers   nbsp    
  Relevant (Beta): 96%  
  Learn More About Debra
You rounded up quite a few numbers here to fit your theory (Earth diameter: 7,917.5 mi, not 7920... The equatorial circumference of Earth is about 24,901 mi... you dropped the 1, why? And also why the equatorial one? The meridional circumference of Earth is 24,860 mi... )
Also, your whole theory falls apart when measured in km or any other system...
  Considerate: 74%  
  Substantial: 77%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 84%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 7.2  
  Sources: 0  
  Entity Sentiment Detection: Earth diameter    equatorial circumference of Earth   meridional circumference of Earth   theory  
  Relevant (Beta): 83%  
  Learn More About Debra
The unexamined thought is not worth thinking.
  Considerate: 89%  
  Substantial: 58%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 91%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 8.6  
  Sources: 0  
  Entity Sentiment Detection: idea of intelligent design mind    doubts   last transition   secular world view  
  Relevant (Beta): 53%  
  Learn More About Debra
I said:
These numbers are based on ideal numbers for diameters etc. I suggest these numbers were of the original design of the solar system, and maybe the entire universe.
  Considerate: 93%  
  Substantial: 95%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 97%  
  Sentiment: Positive  
  Avg. Grade Level: 10.66  
  Sources: 0  
  Entity Sentiment Detection: ideal numbers    numbers   entire universe   original design of the solar system  
  Relevant (Beta): 100%  
  Learn More About Debra
I am coming from the opposite direction Atheist to theist.
  Considerate: 82%  
  Substantial: 27%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 100%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 10.2  
  Sources: 0  
  Entity Sentiment Detection: opposite direction Atheist    theist      
  Relevant (Beta): 97%  
  Learn More About Debra
The unexamined thought is not worth thinking.
  Considerate: 78%  
  Substantial: 49%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 89%  
  Sentiment: Positive  
  Avg. Grade Level: 8.84  
  Sources: 0  
  Entity Sentiment Detection: first gonna    opposite direction Atheist   scientific divine   religious ritualistic divine  
  Relevant (Beta): 77%  
  Learn More About Debra
The Universe is designed
My reply .....Well the burden of proof is with you to prove the validity of your assertions until them it’s merely your opinion and nothing else ....
  Considerate: 79%  
  Substantial: 50%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 85%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 6.68  
  Sources: 0  
  Entity Sentiment Detection: designedMy reply    burden of proof   Universe   validity of your assertions  
  Relevant (Beta): 96%  
  Learn More About Debra
I don't get these numbers out of thin air. They are sent to me.
  Considerate: 83%  
  Substantial: 30%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 100%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 2.56  
  Sources: 0  
  Entity Sentiment Detection: thin air    numbers      
  Relevant (Beta): 97%  
  Learn More About Debra
I'm not trying to prove anything. I'm looking for someone who has more information.
  Considerate: 91%  
  Substantial: 63%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 93%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 8.56  
  Sources: 0  
  Entity Sentiment Detection: information         
  Relevant (Beta): 99%  
  Learn More About Debra
"I do not feel obliged to believe that the same god who has endowed us with sense, reason and intellect, has intended us to forego their use." (Galileo)
IMO. Our propensity to believe in several mythological books/scrolls causes many of us to "forego their use".
  Considerate: 88%  
  Substantial: 47%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 86%  
  Sentiment: Positive  
  Avg. Grade Level: 6.94  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 60%  
  Learn More About Debra
Math is inherent in nature, as it was designed by God. Humans just discover it.
  Considerate: 90%  
  Substantial: 37%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 94%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 7.26  
  Sources: 0  
  Entity Sentiment Detection: Math    Humans   nature   God  
  Relevant (Beta): 97%  
  Learn More About Debra
But on a deeper level, do realise that all the numerical patterns are a result of our numerical and quantitative system. We have a system with the base of 10, we measure distances in miles or kilometers, we measure time in seconds... All of these are very arbitrary and can be changed at will. In fact, the definition of meter changed relatively recently, when we started defining it based on the distance light in vacuum covers in a given period of time, whilst in the past it was defined based on a length of a very specific arc on the Earth's surface.
The intelligent designer is very unlikely to have used the exact same system. Especially since we have multiple systems today, all of which are used widely, and it is not clear to me why everything must be measured exactly the same way Munck suggested.
The idea to find a pattern for the observed quantities that would suggest an intelligent design is very interesting; I really like the proposals of this kind! The idea is not novel, but it is cunning. Similar ideas were proposed as a way to try to establish whether we live in a simulation or not. I read an interesting article recently suggesting that if we live in a simulation, then it is very likely that the designers of the simulation have left some garbage code, or bugs, or deprecated functions somewhere, and if we can find them as something that obviously violates all the laws of the Universe that we are familiar with, then that would be a strong indication that our world is a Matrix.
But the particular attempt you described does not seem practical to me.
  Considerate: 82%  
  Substantial: 99%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 98%  
  Sentiment: Positive  
  Avg. Grade Level: 12.84  
  Sources: 0  
  Entity Sentiment Detection: intelligent designer    average distance   way Munck suggested.The idea   specific historical period  
  Relevant (Beta): 93%  
  Learn More About Debra
I am only at the beginning of my research. What I do know is that the creator (divine or not, I say divine) used multiple, interlocking means of measurement, which includes most known measuring systems. All the way from the foot and mile, to the megalithic yard and even the metric system.
  Considerate: 98%  
  Substantial: 90%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 96%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 8.8  
  Sources: 0  
  Entity Sentiment Detection: means of measurement    creator   way   megalithic yard  
  Relevant (Beta): 85%  
  Learn More About Debra
Really you’re not trying to prove a “god”? .....Why then did you state to @AlofRI ...Math is inherent in nature, as it was designed by God. Humans just discover it.
  Considerate: 77%  
  Substantial: 61%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 88%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 4.78  
  Sources: 0  
  Entity Sentiment Detection: Math    Humans   nature   @AlofRI  
  Relevant (Beta): 98%  
  Learn More About Debra
No, I am really just stating what I think is true. And looking for others who may have information to add on tangents and numbers in the design of the universe.
  Considerate: 96%  
  Substantial: 87%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 97%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 8.3  
  Sources: 0  
  Entity Sentiment Detection: design of the universe    information   tangents   numbers  
  Relevant (Beta): 99%  
  Learn More About Debra
  Considerate: 90%  
  Substantial: 54%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 87%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 4.86  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 87%  
  Learn More About Debra